-
Gesamte Inhalte
19.566 -
Benutzer seit
-
Tagessiege
50
Inhaltstyp
Profile
Forum
Kalender
Shop
Articles
Community Map
Alle Inhalte von gertax
-
VSP1/PM40, monositzbank, rücklicht, scheinwerfe...
gertax antwortete auf Assassin's Thema in Suche Vespa Teile
hab ich selber genug von... :D willst noch nen Scheinwerfer? Hab n paar zu viel... :grins: -
auch der selbe Typ Software?
-
grad is der Speed sehr angenehm mit DSL... heute (gestern) Mittag wars schon schneller als die Tage davor
-
von mir auch nicht... wenn ich mit denen fertig bin werden die betteln mal mitfahren zu dürfen! :D ... oder wenigstens kurz am Auspuff riechen dürfen
-
? ? PK 50 auf PK 80/125 ? ?
gertax antwortete auf OuTLaW's Thema in Vespa V50, Primavera, ET3, PK, ETS etc.
das ist so teuer! is leider so, oder halt nen guten prüfer finden! ;) -
wo kommt denn die Wand auf der Straße, bei wieviel rpm? Was fährst denn für Steuerzeiten und Kolben? Zylinder abgedreht für größere Überströmer?
-
einige Fragen zum Simmering und Getribedichtungen
gertax antwortete auf Werner Amort's Thema in Vespa PX, T5, Cosa etc.
zur Zeit hab ich aber eine drin... :D sogar in allen 3 (von 4) Motoren die zur Zeit fahrbereit sind :p :grins: -
VSP1/PM40, monositzbank, rücklicht, scheinwerfe...
gertax antwortete auf Assassin's Thema in Suche Vespa Teile
her damit! :D :love: -
VSP1/PM40, monositzbank, rücklicht, scheinwerfe...
gertax antwortete auf Assassin's Thema in Suche Vespa Teile
mach noch n Supersprint vor das Special dann passts ucki! :love: :D -
einige Fragen zum Simmering und Getribedichtungen
gertax antwortete auf Werner Amort's Thema in Vespa PX, T5, Cosa etc.
lass die Papierdichtung einfach weg... fahr auch manchmal ohne, ansonsten halt die Dicke von der Originalen Hinterradsiri wechseln geht auch ohne Motor spalten :) -
alles was ich finde ist in Neuseeland, toll... wenn ich da mal in Urlaub hin geh wird einiges an Handgepäck mitgebracht :D kommt schon Leute, schaut doch mal nach, hat bestimmt noch jemand einen den er nicht mehr braucht...!
-
VSP1/PM40, monositzbank, rücklicht, scheinwerfe...
gertax antwortete auf Assassin's Thema in Suche Vespa Teile
ich würd ihn auch tauschen gegen nen kompletten SS90 Lenker und mit der Kohle überleg ichs mir nochmal übers WE... -
schon ok die Banner, aber bitte bitte kein SIP ???
-
...war doch Fairy Antibakteriell ;)
-
klar würd ich so fahren, der Motor saugt nich start genug um was vom Boden innen reinzuziehen für die Sf gibts nen kurzen Lufi von Polini, is dafür dicker, damit dreht sie auch noch hoch ;) obwohl ich da auch ohne fahr
-
dann will ich auber auch ne Quartermile von euch sehen, ausser Konkurrenz natürlich :D Windschatteb bei 60 auf der Quartermile... hehe
-
die hab ich auch! Kauf immer auf Vorrat wenns mal wieder gibt :D Handgeschirrspülmitten (Palmolive mit ---schau mal nach---) geht auch sehr gut
-
ich mag Stockach, allein schon wegen einer genialen Quartermile und nem Prüfstand, ausserdem gibts dort mehr Smallframes als sonstwo auf Treffen! :love:
-
Der neue will ne 50er
gertax antwortete auf Chris.T's Thema in Vespa V50, Primavera, ET3, PK, ETS etc.
ach ja: ebay alle Auktionen Mobile Motoscout da is bestimmt wo was dabei! ;) -
Wer kennt diesen Auspuff?
gertax antwortete auf Brosi's Thema in Vespa V50, Primavera, ET3, PK, ETS etc.
kenn ich nich, sieht auch nich nach monsterleistung aus... aber probier ihn doch mal! -
VSP1/PM40, monositzbank, rücklicht, scheinwerfe...
gertax antwortete auf Assassin's Thema in Suche Vespa Teile
is von mir immer Top gepflecht worden, glaub ich behalt den und lass ihn beschichten, n neuer kost dann ja 325?... will ihn eigentlich bloss hergeben weil ich nen verchromten will und man das ja nur mit neuen Potten machen kann... -
soderle, hier ist der Text den der Karoo meint wenn ich mich nicht irre The Case-Reed Case by Kevin Cameron Reed valves are frustrating things. For many owners of two-stroke engines, the reed acts as a magnet to efforts to soup up the motor -- simply because it's easily accessible and there are alternative products available for it. Alas, sending off for $20/40/60 worth of reeds fails to transform the mild street creature into a blood-red threat to society's foundation. Indeed, in test after test, changes of reed often fail entirely to register on the dyno. Well, perhaps it's not so mysterious; as reed specialist Eyvind Boyesen points out, the reed is half a venturi as it is -- it is a slicker orifice than a rotary valve or piston port at all times except when those systems are fully open. As a sort of venturi, it's not terribly sensitive to precisely how far open its petals flap -- the air just hurries or dawdles a bit to make up the differences. More interesting things happen when people begin to mess with crankcase volume. The air in the crankcase acts as a sort of spring, connecting the piston's motion with the reeds. A tight case transmits the motion promptly and strongly, while a generous case transmits it later and more languidly. We are awakened, however, by discovering that the bigger the case (sometimes), the higher the horsepower. This is a well-established fact for piston-port and rotary-valve designs, but is harder to see for reed engines. People who have "stuffed" their PP and RV engine cases report narrowed and reduced power. Snowmobile racers work hard to build extra volume into their RV cases -- because it works. For reed engines, there are complications because of the strong coupling between case volume and reed action. But why should power rise with case volume? Well, two-stroke power depends upon how much water you use to flush the toilet - a ten-gallon flush gets the cylinder really clean and free from waste products, but a two-gallon flush is marginal. The ratio of the flush volume to the cylinder volume is called the Delivery Ratio. A 1.0 delivery ration means you are flowing 125 cc of fresh mixture through your 125 cc cylinder during the scavenge process. The fraction that gets caught in the cylinder is called the Trapping Efficiency. Delivery ratio clearly depends upon the effectiveness of the crankcase as a pump -- but there is more to it than this. In the early days (1960, for instance), crankcase pumping was a fixation. If you are pumping against a resistance, the pump will work better as its compression ratio is increased. So they increased it -- with plugs in crank balance holes, with skinny knife-edged con-rods working in tiny 6 mm flywheel separations, with super-tight axial and radial crank-to-case clearances, with crank deck-plates, and with stuffers shaped to fit into anyplace empty at BDC. The result was case CRs of 1.5-1.65 -- and narrow powerbands. Later people realized that the engine/crankcase problem is like the man-locked-in-a-bankvault problem; the bigger the bankvault, the longer the man can live on the air available in it. The crankcase is not really a pump, working against a resistance; in fact, it is the engine's moment-to-moment air supply. The bigger the case, the more air can be delivered and sucked from it (by the pipe), and the higher will be the delivery ratio. More air delivered through the cylinder leads to higher retained charge purity (if this is a good design) and so to higher power. Complexity enters. Make the case bigger and get degraded throttle response. Make the case bigger and also thereby alter the relationship between piston motion and reed motion. I argue as follows; using a larger case volume will in general lead to higher power PROVIDED that reed action is not thereby degraded. By degraded, I mean that a significantly bigger case will tend to open the existing reed less far, because the increased air volume is "springier", and doesn't transmit the piston's signal as strongly to open the reed. We can't just fit flabbier reeds, because that will cause a drop in top-end performance. The softer the reed is made, keeping the material the same (i.e. steel, or fiberglass, or whatever), the more slowly it closes. To work at high RPM, the reed must be able to close in the time available -- rather than lag behind the piston, allowing charge to blow back through the carb. The way out of this is to switch to a reed material having a higher ratio of stiffness to weight -- a material such as carbon or Kevlar. I argue, therefore, that the present confusion as to whether reed engines "want" bigger or smaller crankcases has to do with the problems of making reeds work once that change is made. In some engines, the reed may already be on the light side. Such an engine will respond positively to case volume increase -- such as through use of a longer con-rod. Other engines may have stiffer reeds -- perhaps to give them top-end-biased performance -- and such an engine will respond badly to increased case volume. What needs to be done is to accompany any change in reed engine case volume with a corresponding change in reed stiffness and/or stiffness-to-weight ratio. Only then can the success of the venture be properly ascertained. As an aside, it should also be pointed out that the bigger the case, the bigger the carburetor that can successfully be used to serve it. The higher "stiffness" of a small-volume case has to be balanced with the higher intake velocity of a smaller carb and reed, The big case can't tolerate the restriction of the smaller carb as easily, but needs a bigger hole to breathe through.
-
ok, schicks gleich an [email protected] wollt dich vorher noch fragen... aber wenn du meinst... :grins: :p