Marc Werner

Ich lese gerade..."Malossi 136 NO PORTING" !?!?!?!? Handelt es sich wirklich nur um einen gesteckten völlig unbearbeiteten Malossi 136 ?? Viele Grüße ! Marc

Bis Freitag im M-Trunk ! Haben da schon telefonisch einen Tisch für 60 Personen reserviert. Auf Firma "Moskau Inkasso".

Charlie Edmonds "gemütlich" auf Autobahntour mit dem Sachi Twin (7 min / klingt als würde er die 75-80 pmh im Dritten fahren)... http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ356zWnYX4&...feature=related

Mal Fotos: http://www.thirstycattlesc.icb.at/projekt_...LambrettaRD.htm Optisch guter Umbau, im richtigen Takt. Schick !

Zudem noch scheiss Viertakter. Ich find den Sound einfach grässlich. Das paßt in meinen Augen überhaupt nicht zu einem Roller.

Viele Grüße ins Bergische !

Meinen die den Kurvenvergleich wirklich ernst ???? Zitat: "Hier drückt der Nordspeed Auspuff bei gleicher PS Leistung wiederum 0,1 NM mehr!" 0,1 NM ???? Hatte bei einen Prüfstandstag mit dem gleichen Motor / Auspuff bei jedem Lauf Schwankungen im Bereich von 0,1 - 0,4 (PS / NM) In meinen Augen sind die Kurven der Anlagen nahezu Deckungsgleich und dürften sich auch dementsprechend identisch fahren. Für mich wäre demnach nur noch der Preis, die Lautstärke und die Verarbeitung kaufentscheidend. Viel interessanter fände ich mal Kurven von der dicken Bertha und dem Mechanic One. Die werden (ja noch nicht) nachgebaut. Viele Grüße ! Marc

Aus dem Yamaha RD Forum, interessiert hier vielleicht auch den Ein- oder Anderen: -------------------------------- Weils ja hier doch inzwischen einige gibt die unbedingt was rechnen wollen. Der Autor ist Neels van Niekerk (EngMod2T Software, http://www.rddreams.com/neels/engmod2t.pdf ) Quelle: http://forums.pstuning.com/index.php?showt...entry5894 Two-Stroke Engine Simulators 1. The Purpose of a Simulator An engine simulator does not calculate the best tuned pipe (expansion box) or porting or inlet system or crankcase volume etc. for you. You decide what changes you want to make to the engine and then run it through the simulator to see what the effects will be. The accuracy of the results will depend on the accuracy of your input data and the sophistication of the models used in the simulator. It is entirely possible to input completely unrealistic data and have the simulator spit out results. It is up to the user to verify his data, both the input and output data. The simulators are based on 1-dimensional gas dynamics. This means that in the ducts they use one dimensional flow with special models for gradual and abrupt area changes like diffusers, reverse cones, steps and restrictors/throttles. As we all know the flow in the ducts are highly turbulent and 3-dimensional. To solve for these flow cases is entirely possible but would require super computers and run times of days rather than hours or minutes. The cylinders, crankcases, air boxes, boost bottles and exhaust boxes are solved as volumes with no flow calculations. Special models for scavenging and combustion are used. More advanced simulators allow the coupling to 3-dimensional CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) software to calculate the flow inside the volumes but this requires the availability of the CFD software (at a huge cost) and serious computing power with long run times. Thus, the purpose of a simulator considering all the above is not to accurately predict the power output of an engine but to accurately predict the effect of changes to that engine without having to cut metal. 2. How simulators are ranked in the two-stroke world A 2-stroke engine has one thing that sets it apart from its 4-stroke cousins and that is the effect of temperature. It has much larger effects on the 2-stroke engine performance as the engine depends to a large degree on the wave action in the pipes. The wave speed in the pipes is a direct function of the gas temperature. The higher the temperature the faster the wave speed. We use this effect to get good overrun performance - leaning the mixture and/or retarding the timing slows the combustion process down resulting in less expansion work in the engine and higher pipe temperature which in turn results in more overrun. It is important for the simulator to accurately capture this effect. This is done mostly with the combustion model. They are from simplistic to sophisticated as follows: i) Burn rate, heat release characteristic, delay time and burn time (combustion duration) prescribed internal in the software ii) The same as before but the burn time prescribed by the user. iii) Burn rate, heat release characteristic, delay time and burn time (combustion duration) prescribed by the user. Using typically something like Vibe functions for the heat release characteristic. iv) Burn rate, heat release characteristic, delay time and burn time (combustion duration) calculated by the software using a turbulent entrainment model based on some geometry, turbulent intensity, mixture purity and strength and temperature and pressure. v) Full 3-D combustion calculation by connecting to a CFD package. The first three, although increasing in sophistication fall flat when overrun is calculated except maybe the third one if the correct characteristics can be supplied. The fourth one, the turbulent entrainment model, fares a lot better but being a flow model still has some drawbacks. A typical scenario is to use the baseline simulation run to generate the parameters for model three and use that from there on. The fifth model is the best but outside the reach of normal users, requiring expensive yearly licensing and computers. 3. A brief discussion of available simulators Top of the range is Virtual 2 Stroke of Optimum Power Technologies but at US$20000.00 plus per year it is out of the reach of most of us. Some board members has/had the opportunity to use it, mostly as students at some university. It can do multi-cylinder naturally aspirated, supercharged and turbocharged engines with carburetors, indirect or direct injection, with and without catalytic converters, piston, rotary valve or reedvalve inlets, etc. If you can think of something it can do it. It has optimization and distributed computing capabilities. It has a very flexible user interface. It is based on the work of Prof Blair but with some further development to the models by OPT. In the same class as Virtual 2 Stroke is Boost by AVL, GTPower by Gamma Technologies, Wave by Ricardo and the Lotus engine simulator by Lotus Engineering. How good their 2 stroke capabilities are I have no idea. Also based on Prof Blair?s work but for single cylinder use only is the Model No2 software available from SAE. It is very cumbersome to use. Bimotion wrote a nice preprocessor for it. It is meant more as a teaching aid with Prof Blair's book. It has a prescribed burn rate model type 3. Mota6 is a combination of Prof Blair's models and more mainstream gasdynamic methods. I think it uses the 2 Step Lax-Wendroff method to solve pipe flows and an older version of Prof Blair?s scavenging model. It is a great piece of software that runs fast and allows a large number of iterations to be tested in a short space of time. I think its predictions are a bit optimistic. It is for single cylinder engines or multi cylinders where there is no connection between the cylinders thermodynamically or gasdynamic, only mechanically. It has a prescribed burn rate model of type 2. EngMod2T is based on Prof Blair's latest published work and a few bits of unpublished work. (In around 1999 Prof Blair signed an agreement with OPT not to publish or disclose any further simulation models, as he was close to retirement and they pay him well it is probably understandable, profs don't earn all that much) The purpose of EngMod2T was initially for me to understand why certain things work and others don't. It uses more sophisticated models than Mota6, not necessary more accurate but capable of supplying more in-depth data. This sometimes requires more complex input data. This results in longer run times. It can do from 1 to 8 cylinder engines, inline, vee or flat configurations. The flat engines can be separate crankcases (flat) or common crankcases (Boxer) configuration. It has been used to model and develop a Mercury V6 powerboat engine. It has both the burn rate prescribed model of type 3 and the turbulent entrainment model of type 4 available to the user. Dynomation2T I have only used as a demo model but did not like it much. It allowed the user too little freedom with combustion modeling and it used dated methods for the gasdynamics. Dynomation4T has just been through a major revamp, maybe the 2T version will follow? I think it uses a burn rate prescribed model of type 1. Softengine I have only briefly looked at but have no comment for now. TSR software is not simulators but a so called "expert system". It is based on a large database of measured engines. It is a good starting point to develop the inputs for the simulation packages. ------------------------------------

Mensch Brosi, Du warst ja mal jung ! Gut steht Dir das blaue Leder ;) Käm hier in Köln bestimmt sehr gut an.

Liegen da auch Matrazen aus ? Alles kann, nichts muß ?

Wer ist Thomas ? Kenn nur Brosi(-tronic) !!!! @Maniac. Hm schwer zu sagen. GSF hat sich ja als Namen etabliert. Andererseits wären Namen wie "Schaltrollerforum Deutschland" oder "German Classic-Scooterforum" oder oder oder sicher etwas zutreffender...

Freier Eintritt für Nackte ?

Herzlich willkommen zurück ! Ja, komm mal nach Aachen, morgen z.B. ! Viele Grüße ! Marc

Alles Gute nachträglich Rene !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Viele Grüße ! Marc

Die Vorfroide steigt täglich ! Keep the faith ! Marc

Den hätte ich mir gerne bei Dir angeschaut Harald. War der schon da, als ich die Lammy abgeholt hab ? Das steht für die Saison 2010 an, dann würde ich mir den leisten wollen für die LI :))) Hast Du schon den kompletten (Edmonds) Kit inkl Auspuff etc ?

Gutte Besserung Krusten Allda ! @Bergstraße Suche noch für 'ne original weiße PX Lusso Lenkerkopfabdeckung + Kotflügel + Seitenhauben in sehr gutem (Lack-)zustand ! Hat noch wer sowas ? Viele Grüße ! Marc

Gute Ergebnisse bringt den Auspuff vom Krümmer bis hoch zur Hälfte des Resonankörpers zu umwickeln. Matthias / Amazombi hatte das damals meines Wissens nach auch mal kukrz auf der Rolle getestet. Ich auch, jedoch nur mal auf einer Largeframe / RZ Right Viele Grüße ! Marc

Alles Geschmackssache, aber ich find die Karre sieht richtig nach Kirmesbude aus. Passt wunderbar auf nen Karussell oder sowas. Nix gegen Supergrodon und Co. aber der Gesamteindruck gefällt mir einfach nciht.

Sachen sollten in top Zustand (vor allem Lack) sein !! Bei Angebot bitte PM, danke. Grüße ! Marc

Bitte mal Offtopicgeschwalle über Freakmopeds Wellenbearbeitung hier raus lassen. Kennt denn nun jemand den (oder die) fleissigen(n) Italiener der da auf Ebay Anlagen für alle möglichem Mofas, Mopeds und Roller baut und vertickt ? Ganz schön fleissig der Jung. Auch einige Smallframeanlagen dabei. Viele Grüße ! Marc

Bitte melden per PM, danke. Grüße ! Marc

Harald B. ?

OFFTOPIC ABER SAUGEILE ALTSCHÜLERKARRE !!!!!!

Daniel Alder, Alex ist hier im GSF = Piaggjoe Viele Grüße ! Marc