Zum Inhalt springen

My crank


morbin

Empfohlene Beiträge

Hi all,

here are some pics of my crank for a Polini 177. Inlet phase is about 110 nOt - 66 vOT.

dscn24467wm.th.jpg

dscn24475mk.th.jpg

dscn24556er.th.jpg

I made this modification most of all for the blowback problem at low RPM and to optimize flow, now I'd like to know, will it work well? Any suggestion from you experts?

Any comment is wellcome!

Gruss :-D

Matt

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

looks nice :-D

you also did the 1pm thing ?

aaah was heisst wuchten gleichnochmal auf englisch...

Perhaps "balance" would describe it.

1pm thing means the stopping position of a well balanced crank when it`s laid with its ends on two blocks.

@freakmoped: Correct me if i am wrong

Regards

Tec

is 1pm in the position of the green arrow?

dscn24568fj.th.jpg

Yes, you`re right.

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

  • 2 Monate später...

Hi Bene,

thanks for replying.

I have already tried it on my Polini 177, final inlet was around 113-63, but lacked too much low end power for my taste. Then I had a slight heat seizure and put back on an original crank for the moment (inlet 113-42). Now low end power is definitely there but haven't tried it on high rpm.

I was asking again for my next crank, so is the way to fine balancing P125-P150-P177-P200 & more cranks always the same? No weight on the conrod at all?

Thanks,

ciao

Matt

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Yes, no weigth on the conrod-otherwise the results would be corrupt.

But how come you lack low end power now? Do you have heavy sprayback at the carb?

An optimized crank should, basically, give you more power no matter how many revs the engine does.

Right now I'm mounting the original crank and I'm doing ok with low end power even if I have blowback...

For me it was a problem when I had the crank from the pictures because of the too long inlet phase (and maybe not so optimized?). I ride very often in two and the city I live in has lots of down-uphills.

Even short-long stroke, drehschieber-reed-worb5 cranks should stand in the 1pm position?

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

AFAIK a longer inlet timing might affect the low end power as you are changing the inlet resonance frequency, of course.

I do not agree with the statement not to use any "dummy weights" for the oscilating masses of the piston! There is a description on how-to (in german unfortunately) on THIS page! Basically they state to use a certain amount of nuts, which equal the balance factor (between 40 and 50% - matter of philosophy :-D ) of the piston's oscilating masses.

I take of course no responsibility for my statements :-D

Cheers

M

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Maybe the GreenBastard, FreakMoped up there could untie the knot...

Thanks Minikin,

I read a bit and I believe what bigbene told last is correct, and the 1pm thing is all practical and if the crank stands in this position you can consider your crank balanced. The only thing you don't know is how much it is balanced...

And here comes the theory and if you want to do a better balancing you go with the weight at the pleuel and all the calculation stuff...

I hope I understood this stuff:

http://www.germanscooterwiki.de/index.php?...elwelle_wuchten

:-D

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Erstelle ein Benutzerkonto oder melde Dich an, um zu kommentieren

Du musst ein Benutzerkonto haben, um einen Kommentar verfassen zu können

Benutzerkonto erstellen

Neues Benutzerkonto für unsere Community erstellen. Es ist einfach!

Neues Benutzerkonto erstellen

Anmelden

Du hast bereits ein Benutzerkonto? Melde Dich hier an.

Jetzt anmelden
  • Wer ist Online   0 Benutzer

    • Keine registrierten Benutzer online.


×
×
  • Neu erstellen...

Wichtige Information